Supreme Court Allows Part of President Trump Travel Ban
Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to allow President Trump’s ban on a limited basis. The justices called for arguments on the travel ban during the court’s first session in October.
Arguments will be heard on the ban—which denied visas to citizens of six majority Muslim countries and paused admission of refugees from across the globe—and in the meantime, the justices limited the directive’s impact on foreigners with clear ties to individuals, businesses or organizations in the United States.
While three of the Supreme Court justices, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, admitted that they would have allowed the entirety of Trump’s travel ban to take effect while the court reviews the case; after five months of legal uncertainty, the court moved forward with the decision to impose significant limitations on the ban.
For example, people here in the U.S. for college admission, offered work by American businesses or with other formal connections may be exempt from President Trump’s new visa restrictions. Individuals are required to have close family ties to be allowed to enter the U.S.
President Trump signed the rewritten order on March 6 which removed Iraq from the list of seven countries targeted for a 90-day suspension of visa issuance, leaving Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The part of the order that remained the same was the halt to refugee admissions.
President Trump’s initial White House statement hailed the court’s action as “a clear victory for our national security.” The President concluded, “As president, I cannot allow people into our country who want to do us harm.” President Trump stated, “I want people who can love the United States and all of its citizens, and who will be hardworking and productive.”
This is an impressive victory for President Trump’s agenda to make our country safer and it will only get better from this point onward.
JOIN THE CONVERSATION.
POST YOUR COMMENTS BELOW.
LIKE AND SHARE THIS PAGE
WAS MICHAEL COHEN'S FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS VIOLATED?
(The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.)
The 4th Amenedment of the Constitution.
Why in the Zuck does Mark Zuckerberg keep Zucking with us? What the Zuck?????
Facebook’s campaign against Diamond and Silk continues.
The pro-Trump duo are featured in a movie to be released in October and presented by The American Mirror, titled “Dummycrats.”
Check out our Video, Audio and Pictures from the Pocono Raceway "NASCAR."
Two very prominent black pastors in the D.C. area, William Lamar and Delman Coates have filed a lawsuit against Coca-Cola and the American Beverage Association.
California Rep. Adam Schiff has labeled the rumored meeting between fellow Washington Democrats and officials from Ukraine “inappropriate”.
Jesse Watters had a quite busy weekend as he engaged an anti-fascism protester in a debate as the group is calling for violence against the “Trump administration”.
A report released by the Senate on Thursday revealed that the Donald Trump administration has had to deal with one media leak per day since assuming office.
Diamond and Silk does not profess to be expert staticians, but common sense tells us that we need to take a closer look at the current CBO projections in the midst of all the healthcare bill bashing that we are seeing from pundits who just like leaning on nice negative sound bites!!
President Donald Trump met with Enrique Peña Nieto, his counterpart from Mexico on Friday. The duo met at the G20 summit in Hamburg, Germany and President Trump said he "absolutely" wanted Mexico to pay for a massive wall along the US-Mexico border.