Far-Left Watchdog and Ad Industry Groups Faces FTC Investigation for Boycotts Against Independent Media
By The Blog Source
More than a dozen left-wing watchdog and ad industry organizations are under investigation by the Federal Trade Commission for allegedly organizing advertiser boycotts against right-leaning websites and platforms, such as Elon Musk's X. The FTC is investigating potential antitrust violations related to advertiser cooperation as part of its efforts to defund conservative media.
Investigative requests for financial and communication records were made to organizations such as Media Matters and Ad Fontes Media. Advertiser boycotts pose "a serious risk to the free exchange of ideas," according to FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson.
According to four people familiar with the situation, the FTC has launched a comprehensive investigation into about a dozen advocacy and advertising organizations that may have broken federal antitrust laws by planning boycotts to defund conservative and right-leaning media outlets.
The investigation directly confronts the long-standing practice of left-wing watchdogs targeting platforms they find offensive and represents a dramatic increase in the federal government's monitoring of politically driven suppression in internet advertising. The investigation's main focus is on whether progressive groups colluded to coerce advertisers into removing their ads from sites like X, formerly Twitter, on the pretense of avoiding "hateful content."
Investigative letters have already been sent by the FTC to organizations such as Media Matters and Ad Fontes Media, requesting internal documentation, correspondence with other watchdog groups, and records pertaining to their campaigns that target specific content. Ad Fontes CEO Vanessa Otero acknowledged receiving one of the letters on May 20 and stated that it was about a "possible collusion" investigation.
The investigation's primary focus is Media Matters, a left-wing advocacy group with strong ties to the Democratic Party. Publicly advocating to stop advertising on Elon Musk's X platform, the group has released reports alleging that X has permitted "hateful" and antisemitic content. Critics counter that these initiatives are poorly disguised political censorship activities meant to silence dissenting opinions.
FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson, who was recently appointed and has been vocal about the online censorship that targets conservatives, has characterized these advertiser boycotts as more than just market preferences. Ferguson stated at a recent conference that "the risk of an advertiser boycott is a pretty serious risk to the free exchange of ideas, because drying up the advertising will dry up the idea."
Ferguson's position is a significant departure from the prior FTC strategy, which frequently ignored concerted attempts to de-platform content producers with a right-leaning viewpoint under the pretext of "brand safety."
Advertisers, on the other hand, have defended their choices, saying they are just matching business beliefs with spending. However, the FTC under Ferguson is now considering whether those values have been influenced by activist groups working together to stifle particular opinions, which the agency now believes may be unlawful market behavior.
The inquiry comes after Elon Musk sued Media Matters in 2023, alleging that the company purposefully misled advertisers and undermined the financial sustainability of his social media network. The litigation is still pending.
Legal experts close to the probe believe the extent of the document requests is unusually broad, despite the FTC's refusal to comment on the ongoing investigation. Attorneys for the targeted organizations have expressed concerns that the FTC is targeting the media-monitoring and online advertising sectors.
To join the Diamond and Silk Monthly Supporter Program, visit http://SupportDiamondandSilk.com.
Lindell TV, VOCL, ChatDit, Rumble, TruthSocial, and Diamond and Silk Media are all excellent ways to stay connected with Diamond and Silk.
